Configure ProofRelay around your customer trust workflow.

Problem it solves

Security questionnaires arrive in different formats, but many questions repeat. This module turns them into a structured review workflow instead of copy-paste chaos.

Best for

Teams responding to enterprise security questionnaires, DDQs, RFPs, and AI diligence forms.

Problem it solves

The same answer appears in many buyer forms. The claim graph makes the underlying truth reusable without treating prior answers as proof.

Best for

Teams needing consistency across buyers and renewals.

Problem it solves

Evidence lives across drives, GRC tools, Slack, email, and owners. Evidence Vault gives proof a governed home.

Best for

Teams constantly hunting for supporting documents.

Problem it solves

After a questionnaire, buyers ask for proof. Proof packs turn the ask into a reusable packet with missing evidence, disclosure, freshness, and sharing state.

Best for

Teams that send policies, pentest reports, SOC 2 status, COIs, subprocessors, and architecture proof to buyers.

Problem it solves

Founders and CTOs get pulled into every review because ownership is unclear.

Best for

Cross-functional assurance workflows.

Problem it solves

AI and copy-paste can produce risky answers. Safety controls prevent stale, unsupported, or over-shared output.

Best for

Security-conscious vendors.

Problem it solves

Teams do not know what proof is missing until the buyer asks again.

Best for

Proof-heavy follow-ups and enterprise diligence.

Problem it solves

Prior answers are valuable, but they are not governed truth. This module turns history into draft claims and review tasks.

Best for

Teams with spreadsheets, PDFs, and old responses scattered across drives.

Problem it solves

Security and product truth often lives in employee discussion threads, but nobody converts it into reusable assurance content.

Best for

Startups where decisions happen in chat before docs catch up.

Problem it solves

The highest-signal proof requests often arrive in email after the questionnaire is submitted.

Best for

Teams managing enterprise reviews through email threads.

Problem it solves

A claim may be true when answered and stale by the time the buyer asks again.

Best for

Pentests, SOC 2 reports, COIs, policies, subprocessors, and AI posture.

Problem it solves

Not every proof artifact can be sent to every buyer.

Best for

Teams sharing pentests, architecture diagrams, raw reports, or sensitive control evidence.

Problem it solves

Evidence often contains details that should not be shared externally.

Best for

Security teams sharing screenshots, reports, logs, diagrams, or raw artifacts.

Problem it solves

Buyers increasingly ask whether customer data trains models, which providers are used, how data is retained, and how AI risk is governed.

Best for

AI vendors and AI-enabled SaaS.

Problem it solves

AI diligence questions often require provider-specific answers and evidence.

Best for

Companies using OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, custom models, or AI infrastructure vendors.

Problem it solves

Buyers ask where their data goes and whether it is used for training or retained.

Best for

AI/data infrastructure, security, and privacy-heavy vendors.

Problem it solves

AI governance claims are hard to prove unless linked to actual risk-management records.

Best for

Regulated or enterprise AI vendors.

Problem it solves

AI sections in security reviews are becoming their own diligence track.

Best for

Teams repeatedly answering AI/data-handling questionnaires.

Problem it solves

Renewals ask for the same proof plus what changed.

Best for

Annual security reviews and customer reassessments.

Problem it solves

Buyers often ask for everything to be re-sent. This tracks versions, freshness, and shareability.

Best for

Repeated follow-up requests from the same buyer or procurement team.

Problem it solves

Teams make commitments during sales and contracting, but those promises are hard to track later.

Best for

Mature customer trust, legal, and security teams.

Problem it solves

Teams do not know which external answers become stale after internal changes.

Best for

Fast-moving product and AI teams.

Problem it solves

Each buyer relationship develops its own assurance history, but teams lose track after the deal cycle.

Best for

Renewals, expansions, and strategic enterprise accounts.

Problem it solves

Trust centers do not eliminate custom follow-up requests.

Best for

Teams that already publish a trust center but still handle custom proof requests manually.

Problem it solves

Assurance evidence and deal context live across many systems.

Best for

Teams ready to connect GRC, collaboration, source-control, storage, and CRM systems.

Problem it solves

Security review work should map to revenue impact and buyer context without becoming a full CRM.

Best for

Sales-led teams prioritizing diligence by deal urgency.

Problem it solves

Security claims often depend on engineering work that lives in ticketing systems.

Best for

Teams using tickets as operational evidence.

Problem it solves

Most proof artifacts begin in Google Drive, Notion, Confluence, or similar systems.

Best for

Teams that need fast evidence onboarding without a full GRC integration.

Problem it solves

Buyers ask the same proof through different framework languages.

Best for

Teams reusing evidence across security, privacy, and AI frameworks.

Problem it solves

Some buyers force vendors into proprietary portals.

Best for

High-volume teams dealing with fragmented buyer portals.

Problem it solves

Leaders need to know where diligence slows deals down.

Best for

Customer trust, security, and revenue leaders.

Problem it solves

Production enterprise deployments need IdP-managed access and lifecycle controls.

Best for

Larger customer trust teams and production enterprise deployments.